It couldn’t possibly be true, and yet, it is.

There is lead in your chocolate. Dark chocolate has more lead, because it has more cocoa. And it’s not just industrial chocolate like Hersheys that’s affected, but organic chocolate like Green and Black’s. And your children, whose bodies are much more susceptible to the toxicity of lead, are eating it, too. How much lead? Lead concentrations in manufactured cocoa are among the highest of all foods—some have nine times the daily amount that California considers safe to avoid reproductive harm. (California has the toughest laws).
How does the Good Food Fighter know this?
A recent study measured lead in chocolate. The results are here and also below.

After these results were published, the Candy Lobby unsurprisingly put out a statement saying that all foods naturally contain trace minerals and that people have been safely eating candy for hundreds of years. Should we believe that?

No, actually. Lead contamination in candy dates back to the early 19th century. At first, candy was colored with metallic poisons like lead chromate and Brunswick green and their wrappers were printed with lead compounds. Government regulation resulted in eliminating these dyes. More recently, lead has been found in Mexican candy, largely from contaminated chili pepper and tamarind but sometimes from lead-laden wrappers. The CDC has issued warnings about lead contamination during drying, grinding, and storage. The FDA responded with only voluntary “guidelines” for manufacturers, so they are not required to actually make changes. The Texas Poison Center Network provides a list of Mexican candies that surpass the FDA’s safe limit for lead. The sweets that had highest levels of lead were Ricaleta Diablo, Tiramindo, Ricaleta Chamoy, Tutsi Pop and Indy Marimbas.

How do I know this isn’t fake science? The SOW report confirmed the results of an earlier study by Environmental Health Perspectives, found in the National Institutes of Health library, which explains the testing methods. In short, they used a Finnegan MAT Element high-resolution magnetic sector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (HR-ICPMS). Yeah, those are fun to play with so I gave them out as party favors at my son’s last birthday, lol. Lead concentrations were derived from instrumental scans of the three major lead isotopes (206Pb, 207Pb, and 208Pb). Sounds pretty sophisticated to me, but if you need more details, read all about it here.
Where is lead hiding and why is it used?
Lead is a heavy metal that occurs naturally in the earth’s crust, but human activity—mining, manufacturing, and burning fossil fuels —has increased everyone’s exposure. Lead was once used in paint and is still used in gasoline in a handful of countries to boost car performance. Particles from leaded gasoline are absorbed into soil and can be present for years, even after the additive (tetra-ethly lead or TEL) is phased out. Atmospheric lead can contaminate things that are exposed to the air. Currently lead-acid storage batteries account for 88% of world usage of lead. It is also widely used in medical facilities to block X-ray and gamma radiation. Lead acts as a shield against nuclear radiation when nuclear material is being transported. It is also used for solder, pipes (which can contaminate water), pottery (which contaminates food), roofing materials, food cans in some countries, and even cosmetics (which get absorbed through the skin).

Interestingly, cocoa bean shells suck up lead like a sponge so they test high for lead. Cocoa beans tested very low for lead, and the finished chocolate products tested very high, so everyone is trying to figure out where the contamination occurs during the process from bean to bar.
Contamination Theories
- Gasoline: A large percentage of cocoa beans comes from Nigeria. Nigeria used gasoline containing one of the highest levels of lead (tetra-ethyl lead) until about 10 years ago. The lead pollution in Nigeria was mostly due to the combustion of leaded gasoline which caused contamination of dust, plants, and food. Nigerian people also had elevated lead levels in their blood.
Leaded gasoline products - Farming practices. Fertilizers can be contaminated with lead, and some pesticides, like lead arsenate, actually contain it. While these have been discontinued, they remain in the soil for decades.
- Contact with husks. Nigerian cocoa husks are full of lead but the beans inside have very little. They are separated after shelling but unintentional co-mingling may happen somewhere down the line. Traces of husk often end up in the finished cocoa product. Drying beans by the roadside may expose them to pollutants.
Cocoa beans and pods Drying cocoa beans in Ghana - Grinding and manufacturing process: Soldered machine parts contain lead. Wear and tear could result in leaching into products.
- Shipping. I’ve found references to this but no details.
- Additives to final product. Unlikely, but possible. For example, Mexican chili powder, which is added to chocolate, has tested positive for lead.
- Product wrapper. Wrappers were initially printed with lead inks. and some dyes still contain lead.
- Volcanic sediment. Almost all cocoa beans are grown along the equator, and much of the soil is volcanic. Volcanic deposits contain zinc, copper, and lead.
What do the Chocolate Makers say?
Predictably, the biggest manufacturers minimized my concerns and pretended that everything was fine. Here are some excerpts from email exchanges with the companies. (List will be updated as responses come in):
Hersheys: The FDA and many states monitor the amount of lead in food. (We’re off to a bad start here: the FDA is virtually useless since it panders to industry lobbies). All Hershey products meet all FDA and state standards, and our cocoa powder and chocolate are safe to eat. This includes the very strict Proposition 65 standards for lead and cadmium in candy and other products. In fact, our products comply with proposition 65 even when naturally occurring minerals are included…People have been eating cocoa and chocolate for centuries with no evidence of a single incident of concern regarding these naturally occurring minerals. Our products are among the safest in the world. (Actually, they’re not.)
Chocolove: Chocolove beans are purchased mainly from the Ivory Coast. Once it is made into chocolate in Belgium, it is tested for all sorts of minerals, including lead, to ensure it is within US and Belgian federal guidelines. I hope this answers your questions. (It doesn’t.)
Nestle: Nestlè chocolate products pose no health risk. Candy manufactured in the United States follows an FDA-established safety guideline that is among the strictest in the world. There are trace amounts of naturally occurring elements such as lead in chocolate, just as in all natural foods. Minerals – including lead – are part of nature. Because they are present naturally in the soil and water where plants are grown, there are harmless traces of minerals occurring in virtually all foods. According to food safety experts, a person cannot eat enough chocolate in a lifetime for these naturally occurring elements to be of any concern. Have a great day! (I call this “the big blow-off”)
Trader Joe’s: As a privately held company, we do not participate in interviews for articles/publications, nor do we provide public access to copies of internal business documents (of course not, you need to protect yourselves!) …we will not offer any products we feel are unsafe; ever, and we have no reason to believe our chocolate products are not absolutely safe to enjoy (Then you didn’t read the news)…we are always monitoring several aspects of chocolate production in relation to the supply chain and the marketing of “finished goods” to guarantee the quality and integrity of our products…We believe all the ingredients used by our suppliers, no matter where they are sourced, are of the highest quality, and meet our strict standards for quality, taste, and authenticity. (But you didn’t answer the question of why your chocolate bars—so many of them—are dangerously high in lead).
Coracao: (The one chocolate maker who was honest, forthright, well-informed, and clearly seeking answers, like me): I have personally not found or heard of any cacao that tests zero for any contaminants. These tests are new, so we don’t know if it’s new environmental pollution or if it’s always been there…though my guess is that they’ve been present and never before tested. One of my friends owns a biodynamic cacao farm in Ecuador that is helping restore rainforest cover and his cacao tests positive for these contaminants. This is cacao coming from a biodynamic virgin rainforest land plot. Some people think it may be due to the volcanic soil, as cacao only grows around the equator. That would be my best guess, from my experience of seeing cacao test positive, even when coming from pristine areas and processed cleanly.

Consumer Lab, which did the testing, has all kinds of advice, so if you want to know how bad the bad guys are, or more about the brands that got a clean bill of health, you can read about it here. Below I have consolidated the good, the bad, and the ugly. Actually, I removed the bad and ugly because you have it in the chart. Naturally, all these lists are incomplete because the Lab did not test every chocolate in the universe. Ostensibly, they did not test any artisanal chocolate. But this is a start.
To Eat or Not to Eat
I will continue to update this list
Approved chocolate:
- Baker’s Semi-Sweet Baking Chocolate Bar 56% cocoa
- Baker’s Unsweetened Baking Chocolate Bar All Natural 100% cocoa
- Endangered Species Chocolate Natural Dark Chocolate 88% cocoa
- Hershey’s Special Dark Chocolate Bar
- Lily’s Dark Chocolate-Original Stevia Sweetened 55% cocoa
- Ghirardelli Intense Dark 86% cocoa
- Lindt Excellence 90% Cocoa Supreme Dark
Approved for Adults only:
- Chocolove Extra Strong 77% cocoa
- Ghirardelli Chocolate Intense Dark Twilight Delight 72% cocoa
- Trader Joe’s 72% Cocoa Dark Chocolate
I had to subscribe to their site to get the complete lists and analysis which was very extensive. You will be able to see a summary at this link, or you can pay for full access. They rate other consumer products, as well, so it might be worth it.
Lead is Devastating for Children
Even small amounts of lead can cause irreversible developmental problems in children. According to the Environmental Health Coalition, lead poisoning is the top environmental health threat to kids under six years old.
Lead poisoning symptoms in children:
- Developmental delay
- Learning difficulties
- Irritability
- Loss of appetite
- Weight loss
- Sluggishness and fatigue
- Abdominal pain
- Vomiting
- Constipation
- Hearing loss
- Seizures
- Impulsive eating of lead chips and other non-food items
Takeaway:
Dark chocolate has more health benefits than you realize—the darker the better. It’s one of the top power foods, and I’ll blog about it soon. At the same time, we want to minimize your lead (and cadmium) intake. Not all chocolate is safe to eat, and particularly for children. Remember that the “banned” bars are all dark chocolate, because dark chocolate has a high cocoa content. If you eat a low cocoa content you’re consuming more sugar (and/or mediocre quality milk product), plus you miss out on all the health benefits of chocolate. So eat dark, beware of the bars on the blacklist, and check back as I will be adding more safe bars as I discover them. In the meantime, give your kids dark chocolate….sparingly.
Thank you for providing a very detailed and informative article.
I’m grateful that you listed safe dark chocolate products because I tend to eat 1/2 bar every month or so and enjoy adding cocoa powder to my coffee on weekends.
Now, this list will be my ‘go to’ when shopping for chocolate.
Hi Fern,
A half bar a month! You are truly a glutton!!! Kidding—I eat that much every day, but that’s my weakness 😉
Glad that I could help, and stay tuned for updates on chocolate–as soon as new research comes out, I will be on top of it!
-your GFF
Can you list all of your resources so I can come to these conclusions on my own? I see the only researched claim you have here is from an As You Sow article (Which I have researched into myself and come to my own very different conclusions about how they operate and their testing methods) and the Consumer Labs report that I can’t access without paying. Was there any cross-examination done? Where are the links for the companies you posted and their stances. Where are the links for the harmful effects in children, and how much lead causes these effects? What about resources for the benefits of dark chocolate as well, we all know them sure, but resources validate your claims. Hershey’s and Endangered Species chocolate specifically are not approved on the As You Sow article but are approved on the Consumer Lab ( I can’t see so I just have to assume) why is there a disparity in the two resources you do have?
All in all – without any resources listed for me to see for myself these stand as invalidated claims. While I am sure that most of what you say here is true, how do I know it hasn’t been exaggerated or taken out of context for the purpose of this article?
Hi Jamie,
Thanks for your challenge 😉
I appreciate your skepticism—it’s important not to trust everything you read!
Like any good researcher, I consult many different sources. I look for sources that are backed by studies that use empirical methods of testing. I also base my
conclusions on common sense and experience—I know a lot about food already so I can spot spin and propaganda from a mile away.
To your specific questions: It was, indeed, As You Sow that broke the story. They also did follow up research and amended their recommendations accordingly. This is not a black and white issue and they are trying to be judicious. Check out my latest blogpost for their very latest updated list and more information on the ongoing investigation.
Consumer Labs does very comprehensive testing and is not affiliated with any special interests. I wish that I could share the entirety of their findings on chocolate but it would be a breach of copyright to post it.I have also referenced earlier studies–some more than 10 years old–on the discovery of lead in chocolate. These articles go into great depth describing their testing methods. What aspect of their method did you disagree with?
With regard to the benefits of chocolate, their are hundreds of articles and books on the subject, certainly enough for me to write an entire blogpost about it, and I may! If you doubt that cocoa is a superfood, just google it! Same goes with the effects of lead in children—there’s an enormous body of evidence, so a quick search is bound to turn up everything you ever wanted to know.
Lastly, I am not taking money from any company. I am simply educating and trying to protect the public. So I have nothing to gain or lose by praising or criticizing any company. I don’t really have any motive for exaggerating or taking things out of context. I , literally, do the research so that you don’t have to, but you are welcome to do research, too.
Thanks for reading my blog!
-your GFF
I have seen no test results for Trader Joe’s 72 percent Belgian chocolate which comes in packages of three smaller bars, and the 72 percent Belgian chocolate which is wrapped in green and brown package and sold in larger single units.
I’m curious because these are ones I am consuming most often.
Thank you for your research and information.
Eric
Hi Eric,
The researchers who studied lead levels in chocolate were not able to test every single chocolate bar out there so they did a sampling from the major brands. Because so many of Trader Joe’s bars were implicated, I would eat sparingly. Their varieties from both the Ivory Coast and from South America were equally high in lead, so it is possible that there is more contamination in their operations than in others. I question companies that are able to deliver extremely low prices–what are they sacrificing for cost? Because the higher the cocoa content, the higher the lead content, I would eat dark chocolate sparingly as a rule—don’t replace with milk chocolate because there’s really no nutritional value. The lead question is puzzling to almost all chocolate manufacturers and researchers. I hope that we will have more answers soon.
-your GFF
Sorry for being so dense. (It must be from the Lead in the Chocolate I eat)
The toxic metals charts I’ve looked at don’t list the Cocoa I’m concerned about.
Can anyone tell me about the metals (Lead, Cadium, etc) in the Hersheys 100% cocoa unsweetened baking bar,
https://www.hersheys.com/en_us/products/hersheys-unsweetened-chocolate-baking-bars-4-ounce-bars.html
I’ve been told unsweetened 100% cocoa is healthy for people and have been eating a “square” or a few “squares” of the bar per day. However, having just heard about lead and other crap in Cocoa I’m now worried about eating any of it.
PS: I saw a study (printed) on-line where the Bakers brand of unsweetened 100% Cocoa baking bar was rated as the richest in healthy Flavonoids and a best buy. At Winco the Bakers are around $2.69 and the same size Hersheys are $1.96 both are 4 oz 100% cocoa unsweetened baking bars
.
Is endangered species 88% chocolate safe or not?
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your question!
From a fair trade perspective, Endangered Species is ranked very highly. Check out this chart:
https://www.greenamerica.org/end-child-labor-cocoa/chocolate-scorecard?fbclid=IwAR3jeVsKuBsUam0TC-u5WfRqzhSSrrjjREICftIIKynSV5nmQeAcoOHsSmc
In terms of heavy metals, the 88% chocolate bar was found to have traces of lead and cadmium and the 72% bar, lead.
https://archive.asyousow.org/our-work/environmental-health/toxic-enforcement/lead-and-cadmium-in-food/
Since this report was released by As You Sow, chocolate companies have agreed to work together to identify the source of lead and other metals since the cocoa beans are apparently clean but chocolate bars are contaminated. There have not yet been any industry updates, to my knowledge. If you hear of anything, I would be grateful if you would share it with my readers!
Best,
-your GFF
Thank you for the list of approved chocolate. It’s very helpful as I only eat 100% cacao dark chocolate. Based on this list, I’ll be changing my brand.
Do you have any info on approved cacao nibs? I’d like to use nibs in trail mix, however I’ve not seen any studies on nibs.
Thanks
Hi,
Do you have any updates to this? It’s been a few years and I’m struggling to find safe chocolate for my kiddos. They don’t eat candy or processed sugar, so chocolate *seemed* to be the safe bet! Thanks
Hello. Thank you for covering the CR research! I had no idea some (many) dark chocolates have toxic chemicals. Horrible! Important to (continue) exposing corporate crime! And yes, the crime of misleading consumers and concealing toxic ingredients! But this is no news bulletin! I’m just thrilled to see it in my news feed where most ‘news’ seems corporate approved only. I wish CR would promote these studies in a bigger way re: National news outlets, international news, etc.! Thank you again for getting it onto my news feed, which is ‘run’ by google, is that right?
Geez, this puts “death by chocolate” in a completely new light! And maybe taking candy from a baby is actually a kind thing to do…
“Gimme that, kid!”
Thank you Your article is so enlightening. Can you find out if carob powder or such products have lead in that product. I was advised by my doctor to eat this in place of chocolate bc of my high blood pressure.